Detachable libpurple - RPC system
daniel.atallah at gmail.com
Thu Jun 10 17:20:26 EDT 2010
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 14:16, <gillou.ray at free.fr> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:11:13 +0200
> gillou.ray at free.fr wrote:
>> I may do a nice drawing about all this
>> detachable libpurple stuff (later).
> Here it is:
> The dotted lines show the path of a DBus call or signal. I let it in SVG
> so that you could edit it.
> Really, I need an answer from the the developpers now. Is this
> approach OK ? Please report! I know draws don't replace code, and I
> havn't showed any since the beginning of this SoC. Maybe we all are
> very busy by other stuff...
This sounds like a sound approach to me.
I'm a little confused by part of your diagram though; it appears to
have the libpurple and GUI communicating via DBus (not just the
libpurple (remote mode) connection to the libpurple (normal mode)).
Am i misunderstanding that? Why is this necessary - it seems like an
unnecessary second level of abstraction.
More information about the Devel