Always call purple_privacy_check() for incoming IMs
mark at kingant.net
Fri Jul 31 15:15:14 EDT 2009
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Mark Doliner<mark at kingant.net> wrote:
> How do people feel about the attached diff? It changes serv_got_im()
> to always call purple_privacy_check(), regardless of whether the PRPL
> has implemented a set_permit_deny callback function.
> It effectively does client-side blocking of incoming IMs regardless of
> the protocol. This has no effect for AIM, where the server enforces
> the permit/deny setting. But it benefits ICQ, where the permit/deny
> setting controls invisibility and our block list is actually a list of
> people to whom you're invisible. Other protocols this might affect:
> MSN, Yahoo, Novell, Sametime.
> Based on Sulabh's email thread it seemed like people tended to be in
> favor of this.
(with the diff this time)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1033 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Devel