Making Pidgin small-screen-friendly
michael.terry at canonical.com
Tue Feb 24 14:59:51 EST 2009
OK, to summarize where we are now.
My preferences patches seem like good ideas, but there's some resistance
to the 'Sound Events' being to the right of other columns. We're not
willing to lose the one-column mode. I'll re-examine.
Since the patches are split up by page, the other patches can go in, if
Moving pounce triggers to use more columns helps. I don't think it goes
far enough. I'll look into a patch that makes the 'send a message' box
be a popup, showing a preview in the main dialog.
Sounds like moving proxy settings into a new tab will help. I think
that's actually probably enough for SILC. I'll check. But long-term,
it would be nice to have a general solution for this, so plugin authors
don't break the dialog.
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 15:52 -0500, John Bailey wrote:
> Etan Reisner wrote:
> >> 14. Drop dialog separator, possibly shrink dialog spacing a bit (looks
> >> like it's ending up with a 20 pixel border, but I think you are rightly
> >> intending it to be 12, per HIG).
> > Yeah, the separator should probably go.
> No "probably" about it, let's lose that ASAP.
> > The largest gain for this dialog could probably be found by making the
> > 'Send a message' action work the way the per-account message stuff works
> > in the Status dialog, that is have the message shown inline and have it
> > pop up a dialog for editing. I'm not sure I like the idea but it would be
> > the most effective single change.
> I have no objections to this, but I would suggest not showing more than a few
> words' worth of text (~25 characters perhaps?).
> > As a side note, I've been thinking about moving the per-account Proxy
> > settings into their own tab (so we would have Basic, Proxy, and Advanced
> > tabs) which would help with the dialog height a little bit for the more
> > "complicated" protocols.
> I was actually going to suggest this, as it seems proxy options aren't a
> particularly good fit on either existing tab.
> > One further thing we could consider regarding the New Buddy Pounce dialog
> > is that we know that quite a lot of people get to the dialog by right
> > clicking an entry in the buddy list and selecting Add Buddy Pounce so
> > perhaps we might want to consider (in that case) not giving people the
> > account dropdown and buddy entry area but rather just making the 'Pounce
> > on Whom' text include that account/buddy information in line.
> > -Etan
> I have no problem with this, but I suspect we're going to see some complaints
> about this because if the user wants only Buddy B in Contact A to be pounced on,
> the user has to either use the submenu for the appropriate buddy in the contact
> or expand the contact. Granted, we have complaints already because pounces
> aren't contact-aware.
mterry | UI & App Engineer, Canonical Ltd. | +1 781 761 9092
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Devel