UPnP in libpurple
evan.s at dreskin.net
Mon Jun 30 00:04:56 EDT 2008
On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:13 PM, John Bailey wrote:
> Evan Schoenberg wrote:
>>> Can we even use libnatpmp? Its license requires attribution for all
>>> redistributions and modifications.
>> Where do you see that?
> The license text I pasted came directly from natpmp.c in the
> libnatpmp source
Indeed; I checked the same. I don't see how that license requires
attributed for redistributions and modifications, though.
>> MiniUPnP is distributed with a 3-clause BSD license.
> It seemed to me from the thread's progression that miniupnp was not
> the code we
> intended to use; this is why I was talking specifically about
*nod* I said this to lead into the next paragraph. However, MiniUPnP
may turn out to have a better UPnP implementation than we currently
sport, as well.
>> libnatpmp, distributed at the same site by the same author, does not
>> include a LICENSE file. I have emailed the author to inquire as to
>> intended licensing and seek clarification. I'll let the list know
> Sean replied to me off-list (I suspect he merely missed "reply all"--
> *really* needs a reply-to-list button) and pointed out that the
> license is the
> standard ISC license, which according to the FSF is definitely GPL-
> I did not recognize the license text; this is why I questioned it.
> Since it's a
> known compatible license, I have no issues with it now.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Devel