Use case for per-protocol icons
yurimxpxman at gmail.com
Mon Aug 6 23:34:28 EDT 2007
On 8/6/07, Ethan Blanton <elb at pidgin.im> wrote:
> This is *precisely* what I'm talking about, yes! If you don't
> understand the following argument, then this is absolutely the source
> of the disconnect, and we simply believe that you are wrong, plain and
> simple. The user should not have to KNOW that MSN uses nudge and
> Yahoo! uses nudge -- the user should simply say "I want to get my
> friend's attention", and Pidgin should handle "nudging" or "buzzing";
> these names are essentially arbitrary labels for the same thing, which
> differ only because the protocol servers have a meaningless difference
> in terminology.
No, because very few protocols support this. That's my point.
> Yeah, that's a terrible idea, a waste of time, and a waste of
> resources. You should at least use libpurple as-is, as an installed
> library, as, e.g., Adium does. Anything else is lost effort. That
> said, if you do use monotone, or another capable distributed VCS,
> changes to libpurple could conceivably be ported back and forth
> without contortionist effort, if there were anything worthwhile to
> move in the "back" direction.
That's still to be worked out (I've written very little code so far.
I'm mainly just in the idea stage atm). There are a few things that I
want to change about libpurple and finch, most of which you would not
want changed for pidgin. So I'm still trying to decide how I'm going
to deal with that.
More information about the Devel