Changing user icons
s0cman7 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 13 16:15:28 EST 2009
Let me preface this by saying that I have read Sean Egan's post on
Identity<http://pidgin.im/%7Eseanegan/blog/identity.html>as well as
here <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/2007-October/003555.html> and
I understand the reason for using the "green dots" rather than the im
protocol icons (Gaim-style icons) is that the developers wish for the end
users to be recognized as a single person rather than multiple people on
multiple networks. And that they wish screen names to be associated with a
person rather than a network. I get that and I can completely understand
that most people would prefer that, as it simplifies the information that is
presented to the user. Also, I have implemented the option to show the
protocol icons as secondary icons.
With respect to all of this I still would like to have the option to use the
protocol icons instead of the "green dot", the way Gaim looked. I have a
few reasons for this:
1. Icon simplicity: Current there are two icons displayed for each
user, one to show their status and one to show their protocol. This could
be simplified into one icon showing both, they way Gaim showed worked.
2. Aesthetics (for some): I prefer the way Gaim looked simply because I
liked it. I do not have a specific reason other than personal preference.
I know that other people prefer the way pidgin currently looks, but that
again is a personal preference. You can look at this another way, some
people think that Picasso's painting of Three
a beautiful master piece and that it cannot be improved on. While
do not understand it and believe that a 3-year old child could have painted
it. It is simple a matter of personal preference.
3. Open source: This is open source software and as such is a
collaborative project. It requires input from all parties to develop the
best software that the community can. Simply ignoring part of that
community and rejecting their ideas alienates part of the community. This
is not the xxx behind an open source project.
4. Appease a small group: Again, I understand that this would only be
helpful for a small group of users, but that was part of the idea behind the
"green dot". While reading one of the tickets a developer mentioned that
the "green dot" was implemented so that it would be easier for color blind
people to use. This is a very small amount of the population (even though 2
of the developers are color blind). So part of the reason the "green dot"
was implemented was to appease a small group of users. I think the
implementing Gaim-style icons would appease an equally small group of users.
5. What the developers believe: The Gaim-style icons are no longer used
because the developers do not believe people should use their program that
way. I believe that end users should be able to use programs the way they
see fit. This is a belief and I think the developers should
respecteveryone's beliefs. They should not try to impose their beliefs on
others (as with religion, political views, morals, etc.), but rather give
the end user the option to use the program the way they believe it should be
Again, I completely understand why the "green dot" is used as opposed to
Gaim-style icons. I am simply asking the the end user be given the option
to use the icons they wish, no matter what their reason. I hope I have not
been too long winded, I am simply voicing my opinion in the hopes that I can
improve the program. If I knew anything about programming I would probably
take the time to modify is myself, but unfortunately I do not.
Thank you for taking the time to read this and hopefully you consider my
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Support