Time to drop the qq plugin?

Christopher Forsythe chris at growl.info
Tue May 10 12:39:12 EDT 2011


On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:00 AM, microcai <microcai at fedoraproject.org>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2011年03月25日 09:13, Etan Reisner wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:35:44PM +1300, Eion Robb wrote:
> >> As weight to the argument, there's an actively developed third party
> >> prpl providing a newer version of QQ.
> >> https://code.google.com/p/libqq-pidgin/
> >
> > We gave the openq people access to mtn (ipp.openq) when they stepped up
> to
> > maintain the current prpl (though they have clearly stopped contributing
> > to us, I'm assuming openq itself is also fairly dead).
> >
> > Do we want to consider doing that with the libqq-pidgin authors? Give
> them
>
> I AM one of the  libqq-pidgin maintainers.
> Actually I was thinking about inform you guys about migrating the
> libqq-pidgin when it get ready.
>
> And , yeah, it works now. But due to *not upstream* so it does no exist.
> Few people have tried. We need more test. And brings it to the upstream
> seems to be the right choice.
>
>
I'd think it would be better to just direct those who want qq to this prpl
rather than ship this one since it's so new.

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110510/fc4b0858/attachment.html>


More information about the Devel mailing list